Antiarthritic Activity Of Anthraquinones Found In Aloe Vera For Podiatric Medicine
By Robert H. Davis, Ph.D.; Patrick S. Agnew, B.S. & Eugene Shapiro, B.S.
Journal Of The American Podiatric Medical Assoc., Vol 76, Number 2, February 1986
Rheumatoid arthritis is a painful and crippling systemic disease for which there is no
cure. The best experimental model for studying rheumatoid arthritis in humans is the adjuvant-induced arthritis in
rats. One of the group of compounds found in Aloe is the anthraquinones. These substances have been recognized for
their use in veterinary medicine against inflammation. The authors evaluate the anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic
activity of anthraquinone, anthracene, cinnamic acid, and anthranilic acid found in the Aloe vera plant, and show
what contribution each ingredient makes toward the total activity found in Aloe.
In previous studies, the authors have shown that Aloe gel extract has anti-inflammatory
and antiarthritic activity.1 Combinations of Aloe with ascorbic acid, thymus extract, and RNA
significantly improved the activity.2 The chemical makeup of Aloe holds a valuable key to antiarthritic
activity that could be used by podiatrists to treat patients.3 Elements in Aloe gel include lignin,
saponins, anthraquinones, inorganic ingredients / minerals, vitamins, enzymes, and amino acids. Anthraquinones such
as anthracene have been recognized for their use in veterinary medicine against inflammation. They possess
anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and tissue repair properties.
No doubt anthraquinones have a bearing on the healing and pain-killing effectiveness of
the fresh leaf gel. Few people understand the meaning of the anthraquinone complex in Aloe. Many studies verify the
successful treatment of burns, ulcers, and dermatitis, but no one knows why Aloe has these healing
qualities.5 The authors propose to test the antiarthritic and anti-inflammatory activity of
anthraquinone, anthracene, cinnamic acid, and anthranilic acid in an adjuvant arthritis model in order to determine
if there are possible ingredients that can be used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. This approach will help us
understand the antiarthritic activity of Aloe. The purpose of this study is to determine, in part, the active
elements in Aloe so as to unlock the mystery of the gel. Many medicines in common use today, such as digitalis and
quinidine, were derived in a similar way from barks and leaves.
Materials And MethodsAdult male Sprague-Dawley rats (175 to 200 gm, 12/group) were
injected with heat-killed Mycobacterium butyricum. The bacteria were suspended in light mineral oil at 5
mg/ml. Under ether anesthesia, two groups of rats were injected in their right hind paw with 0.1 ml of oil. All the
other groups were injected with the suspended bacteria. Six hours after the injections, the day 0 measurements were
taken. Two experiments were conducted together. One study investigated the effect of anthraquinones on the
prevention of adjuvant arthritis. The other study determined their effect on established adjuvant arthritis. Three
control groups were used. The animals injected with oil alone were used to be sure that the oil, itself, did not
cause swelling. One of the groups injected with adjuvant was also injected with distilled water at the same times
and amounts as those groups being treated. This was done to determine whether the volume and frequency of
injections affected the amount of swelling. A third group was injected with the adjuvant.
In the first experiment, prevention of adjuvant arthritis by anthraquinones was studied.
The right hind paws of two control groups were injected with the adjuvant, and day 0 paw volume measurements were
taken. One of the control groups was injected with 10 ml of water subcutaneously daily for 13 days beginning on day
0. Either anthraquinone, anthracene, cinnamic acid, or anthranilic acid was injected into rats in four other groups
that had received M. butyricum. Each day the anthraquinones were injected subcutaneously at 150 mg/kg
aqueous suspensions.
In the regression study, the rats were injected with M. butyricum suspension. The
symptoms of adjuvant arthritis usually take from 14 to 21 days to develop. After 21 days, treatment was initiated
with 150 mg/kg suspensions of anthraquinones subcutaneously daily from day 21 through day 33.
Adjuvant arthritis in rats manifests itself by swelling in all paws, especially the hind
paws, gonads, and ears. A water plethysmograph was used to monitor the hind paw volume. The plethysmograph was at
zero prior to each reading while maintaining constant sensitivity to obtain consistency. Edema in the injected
(right) hind paw was considered to be inflammation caused by trauma. Prolonged inflammation in this paw was
maintained by the slow release of the M. butyricum. Any edema in the left paw was considered to be an
immunological phenomenon.6,7
The rats were anesthetized with ether on paw-measuring days. Their hind paw volumes were
determined by dipping them into a fluid-filled cell up to the anatomical hair line. Day 0 measurements were taken 6
hours after the paws were injected with M. butyricum adjuvant or oil alone. This initial measurement was
used as a reference from which units of edema were calculated in the prevention study. These units of edema were
calculated by subtracting the day 0 volumes from those measured on days 7, 14, and 21. The base-line values for
calculating units of edema in the regression study were measured on day 21. Day 21 values were viewed as 0 units of
edema. The hind paws were measured on days 0, 21, 28, 35, and 38 for this study.
The animal’s body weight was measured on days 0 and 2l in both studies and day 38 in the
regression study. The change in weight during the experiments was calculated by subtracting from day-38 weights in
the regression experiment. The change in edema was divided by the change in weight to obtain a relative change in
edema. This served to rule out any gain in paw volume caused by weight gain. A CU-5 Medical Land Camera was used to
photograph representative rats on days 21 (prevention study) and 38 (regression study). This was done to
demonstrate the difference in paw edema between the rats receiving anthraquinones and the control rats. Mean paw
volumes and body weights were recorded for all animals. Standard errors were determined by using the formula SE = E
d2/N(N - 1). The deviation of individual values from the mean is
Ed2, and N - 1 represents the degrees of freedom.
Results And DiscussionPrevention of Arthritis. Aloe has antipyretic and
anti-inflammatory activity that has been used to treat burns and skin conditions over the years. Splitting the
leaves of Aloe and applying the gel directly to burns produces beneficial effects.8 The curative
principle occurs within the pulp and rind of the leaf.9 The authors have administered fresh Aloe leaf
extract to prevent or regress adjuvant arthritis. Aloe extract produced a 48% inhibition of inflammation and a 72%
inhibition of the immune response (the arthritis) when 150 mg/kg of Aloe extract was administered subcutaneously,
daily, over 13 days as preventive measure.1
The anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic activity of the anthraquinones were tested to
determine if they could prevent the formation of arthritis. An increase in volume of the right hind paw is an
anti-inflammatory response to the presence of the adjuvant, whereas the swelling of the left hind paw is an
autoimmune response, in part, against the animal’s own cartilage. Mycobacterium butyricum is similar to
cartilage so that the immune response attacks both. Swelling occurs in both hind paws injected with adjuvant. This
swelling continues to increase over the entire experimental period. Aqueous controls received equal amounts of
water injections as those receiving injections of anthraquinone. Since these animals swelled somewhat more than
those receiving the adjuvant, the volume or the trauma of daily injections contributed to the disease process. In
order to more accurately estimate the effect of the compounds under investigation, the response of anthraquinones
was compared to the aqueous injected adjuvant controls.
Figure 1 |
Prevention of adjuvant arthritis with anthraquinones. |
Forst and Davis10 have shown that anthranilic acid has antiarthritic activity.
This compound is present in Aloe and was considered as an activity internal control so that the authors could be
certain that the responses recorded in the study were real and not phantoms. Edema in the right hind paw
(inflammation) was 40% less than the aqueous adjuvant control animals on day 21 (Table 1; Fig. 1). The left
hind paw (immune) was 35.5% less than the controls. The percentage of inhibition by anthranilic acid corrected for
body weight was 79.7% in the inflammatory paw and 42.4% in the immune paws. Tryptophane, an active
anti-inflammatory compound, is produced from anthranilic acid. Previous work showed that tryptophane inhibited
arthritis 75% in the immune paw.10 Anthranilic acid may work through tryptophane.
Table 1Prevention of Adjuvant Arthritis with Anthraquinones in Ratsa,b
|
Protocol |
Aqueous
Adjuvant
Controlc |
Anthraquinone |
Anthracene |
Cinnamic
Acid |
Anthranilic
Acid |
|
Treatment
(mg/kg x 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 0 to 12 |
|
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|
Number of rats |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
Final body weight (g) |
254 +/- 12 |
249 +/- 12 |
271 +/- 13 |
261 +/- 9 |
275 +/- 5 |
|
Edema of hind paws
(volume units +/- SE) |
|
|
|
|
|
Day 7 |
Left |
1.59 +/- 0.05 |
1.59 +/- 0.08 |
1.49 +/- 0.04 |
1.50 +/- 0.04 |
1.40 +/- 0.04 |
|
Right |
2.59 +/- 0.10 |
2.28 +/- 0.16 |
2.41 +/- 0.12 |
2.41 +/- 0.08 |
2.41 +/- 0.09 |
Day 14 |
Left |
1.62 +/- 0.19 |
1.54 +/- 0.06 |
1.61 +/- 0.11 |
1.72 +/- 0.09 |
1.52 +/- 0.05 |
|
Right |
2.38 +/- 0.21 |
2.53 +/- 0.22 |
2.43 +/- 0.18 |
2.41 +/- 0.09 |
2.22 +/- 0.08 |
Day 21 |
Left |
0.53 +/- 0.12 |
1.11 +/- 0.16 |
0.80 +/- 0.06 |
0.66 +/- 0.08 |
0.34 +/- 0.11 |
|
Right |
1.56 +/- 0.32 |
1.42 +/- 0.19 |
1.82 +/- 0.19 |
1.26 +/- 0.13 |
0.93 +/- 0.12 |
|
Percent inhibitiond |
|
|
|
|
|
Day 21 |
Left |
|
-10.90 |
-50.90 |
-23.80 |
35.50 |
|
Right |
|
9.00 |
-16.70 |
19.20 |
40.20 |
|
Relative weight ratio
of hind paws
Relative change
in volumee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Left |
0.700 |
-0.214 |
-0.178 |
-0.146 |
0.297 |
|
Right |
1.142 |
0.802 |
0.021 |
0.381 |
0.950 |
|
Percent inhibitiond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Left |
|
-30.6 |
-25.4 |
-20.9 |
42.4 |
|
Right |
|
67.3 |
17.6 |
32.0 |
79.7 |
a |
Initial body weight, 170-185 g. |
b |
Symbols: +/-, standard error; and the negative value (-, minus)
means swelling. |
c |
Adjuvant arthritis with 0.1 mg/kg H2O x 13, day
0-12. |
d |
Percent difference from aqueous adjuvant controls. |
e |
Change in hind paw vol. aqueous
adjuvant
Change in body weight
|
|
Change in test paw vol.
Change in body weight
|
= Relative change in volume. |
|
|
Anthraquinone had the most preventive antiarthritic activity recorded of
the three Aloe compounds tested. Anthraquinone inhibited inflammation 67.3%, which was the
largest response next to anthranilic acid. Anthracene had no antiarthritic activity, but a
17.6% inhibition of inflammation was obtained in the inflammatory paws. This is about one third
the effect seen with anthraquinone and anthranilic acid. A good positive anti-inflammatory
response was also obtained with cinnamic acid (32.0%).
Figure 2 |
Regression of adjuvant arthritis with
anthraquinones. |
Regression of Arthritis. Anthranilic acid had no antiarthritic
activity in the regressive phase, unlike its ability to prevent the onset of the disease
(Table 2; Fig. 2). On the other hand, anthraquinone showed anti-inflammatory activity,
but exhibited no anti-immune response in the regression phase. Cinnamic acid exhibited no
anti-inflammatory effect, but a 17.3% regression of the immune response was recorded. This is
somewhat opposite to the effect measured against prevention of arthritis. Since the
anthraquinones show activity that helps to explain the overall response seen with Aloe, future
studies should evaluate other ingredients such as amino acids, enzymes, vitamins, and
saponins.
Table 2Regression of Adjuvant Arthritis with Anthraquinones in Ratsa,b
|
Protocol
|
Aqueous
Adjuvant
Controlc
|
Anthraquinone
|
Anthracene
|
Cinnamic
Acid
|
Anthranilic
Acid
|
Treatment (mg/kg x 13) |
|
Days 0 to 12
|
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
|
Number of rats
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
|
Final body weight (g)
|
333 +/- 12
|
315 +/- 8
|
320 +/- 14
|
329 +/- 16
|
336 +/- 9
|
Edema of hind paws (volume units +/- SE) |
Day 28 |
Left
|
1.67 +/- 0.13
|
1.71 +/- 0.14
|
1.80 +/- 0.12
|
1.62 +/- 0.09
|
1.67 +/- 0.05
|
|
Right
|
3.07 +/- 0.78
|
2.61 +/- 0.25
|
3.38 +/- 0.26
|
3.13 +/- 0.30
|
3.00 +/- 0.29
|
Day 35 |
Left
|
1.76 +/- 0.14
|
1.84 +/- 0.18
|
1.89 +/- 0.12
|
1.74 +/- 0.11
|
1.77 +/- 0.11
|
|
Right
|
3.41 +/- 0.27
|
3.00 +/- 0.25
|
3.69 +/- 0.29
|
3.91 +/- 0.44
|
3.52 +/- 0.32
|
Day 38 |
Left
|
0.65 +/- 0.09
|
0.80 +/- 0.10
|
0.87 +/- 0.36
|
0.52 +/- 0.06
|
1.53 +/- 0.12
|
|
Right
|
1.63 +/- 0.15
|
1.26 +/- 0.13
|
1.96 +/- 0.16
|
1.82 +/- 0.17
|
1.65 +/- 0.19
|
Percent inhibitiond |
Day 21 |
Left
|
|
-22.9
|
-34.4
|
-20.0
|
-135.0
|
|
Right
|
|
22.7
|
-22.2
|
-11.7
|
-1.2
|
Relative weight ratio of hind paws
Relative change in volumee |
|
Left
|
-0.157
|
-0.193
|
0.072
|
-0.530
|
0.297
|
|
Right
|
1.038
|
0.138
|
-0.323
|
-0.159
|
0.020
|
Percent inhibitiond |
|
Left
|
|
-37.0
|
-46.5
|
17.3
|
-127.7
|
|
Right
|
|
13.3
|
-31.1
|
-15.3
|
1.9
|
a |
Initial body weight, 170-185 g. |
b |
Symbols: +/-, standard error; and the negative value (-, minus)
means swelling. |
c |
Adjuvant arthritis with 0.1 mg/kg H2O x 13, day
0-12. |
d |
Percent difference from aqueous adjuvant controls. |
e |
Change in hind paw vol. aqueous
adjuvant
Change in body weight
|
|
Change in test paw vol.
Change in body weight
|
= Relative change in volume. |
|
SummaryAnthraquinones found in Aloe may be responsible for the
healing properties and anti-inflammatory activity recorded. This study has shown both
anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic activity that can be improved by combining Aloe with
ascorbic acid, thymus extract, and RNA. Since the chemical composition of Aloe holds a valuable
key to its activity, the antiarthritic and anti-inflammatory activity of the anthraquinone
complex in the adjuvant arthritis rat were tested. Anthraquinone and cinnamic acid exhibited
anti-inflammatory activity in the prevention study. Anthranilic acid prevented inflammation as
well as arthritis. Both anthraquinone and cinnamic acid exhibited activity in the regression
phase. This work proves that the anthraquinone complex contributes to the healing properties of
Aloe.
References
|
Whole Leaf Aloe Vera - Antiarthritic Activity Of Anthraquinones Found In Aloe Vera For Podiatric Medicine
|